In this interview, she reflects on
- her scientific journey,
- the importance of visibility, mentorship, and institutional support for women at all stages of research careers,
- and how inclusive research cultures contribute to better science and more equitable patient care.
Toward More Women-Friendly Research Cultures: A Conversation with Dr Tatiana Cajuso
Scientific research today increasingly depends on advanced technologies, large datasets, and collaboration across disciplines. At the same time, issues of access, representation, and visibility continue to influence who leads scientific work and how research findings are translated into practice.
The International Day of Women and Girls in Science is an opportunity to recognise the contributions of women scientists and to reflect on the conditions that support more inclusive and effective research environments.
For this occasion, we had the privilege of speaking with Dr Tatiana Cajuso, Senior Scientist at the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland.

What inspired you to pursue a career in science, and how did your path lead you to your current role?
From a very young age, I was fascinated by understanding biological processes and asking “why.” For example, I experienced migraines early in life, which sparked my curiosity about what happens in the human brain to cause pain. That curiosity made biology feel like a natural fit.
Looking back, my path seems coherent, but at the time it was shaped by curiosity and opportunity rather than a fixed plan. After my studies, I pursued a Master’s degree both to deepen my knowledge and to study abroad. During this time, I came to Finland for an Erasmus internship, where I became deeply interested in cancer research and decided to pursue a PhD.
During my PhD, an unexpected finding became central to my thesis and shaped my research direction. A professor in the US working on related questions inspired me to pursue a postdoctoral fellowship there.
After two years, I returned to Europe to broaden my research and be closer to my family, which led me to my current role as a senior scientist.
This position allows me to contribute scientifically, develop new ideas, and mentor younger researchers, something I find especially meaningful.
Looking back, were there key moments or people who influenced your decision to stay in research?
Several people played a crucial role at different stages. One was my high school biology teacher, who encouraged me at a moment when I doubted whether I was “good enough” for science and considered choosing an easier path. His confidence in me helped me follow my passion rather than my fear.
Later, a professor at the University of Barcelona, who became my Master’s supervisor, encouraged me to pursue research and supported my decision to go abroad. That experience laid the foundation for my scientific career.
Finally, my PhD supervisor in Finland offered me the opportunity to pursue doctoral studies when I expressed my interest. Without that support, I may not have remained in academia. While my current role is broader and involves many responsibilities, my motivation for research remains very strong.
What challenges have you encountered as a woman building a scientific career in research environments?
Looking back, one of the biggest challenges may have been the lack of visible role models. Historically, many contributions by women scientists were overlooked or under-recognised, such as Rosalind Franklin’s work, which helped underpin the discovery of the DNA double helix, or Barbara McClintock’s pioneering view of mobile DNA, which was not fully accepted by the scientific community until years later. This long history of limited acknowledgement can shape how women see their place in science and can decrease confidence. In addition, senior leadership positions in science have tended to be more male dominated, which can reinforce the perception that there are fewer pathways or fewer examples to follow.
For me, these dynamics may have sometimes translated into a tendency to question myself more than my peers, along with a feeling that I need to work harder to prove my competence. While this drive can be motivating, it can also create persistent self-doubt and lower confidence, factors that can contribute to women leaving academic science.
That is why visibility, mentorship, and strong institutional support matter. Encouraging women and girls to pursue science is important, but so is supporting them throughout training and career transitions, so that leadership in research becomes more balanced over time.
Have you seen changes over time in how women are supported or recognised in science? Where do gaps still remain?
Yes, there have been clear and positive changes. Historically, many female scientists did not receive recognition proportional to their contributions, and this has thankfully begun to change. Today, there are more women in science and increasing visibility of women in leadership roles.
That visibility matters enormously for younger generations, helping them to imagine scientists as people of all genders and identities. However, gaps remain, particularly at senior levels and in certain fields. Continued effort is needed to ensure equitable recognition, career progression, and access to leadership opportunities.
The focus of this year’s International Day of Women and Girls in Science is on showcasing solutions. From your experience, what concrete practices help create more inclusive and supportive research environments for women?
Broader societal shifts toward gender equality already play an important role, but concrete institutional measures are also critical. Gender equality plans at the institutional and funding-agency levels help make inclusion a structural priority rather than an individual responsibility. In day-to-day research, further improvements in fair and transparent recruitment, inclusive leadership, and better workload recognition can make a difference. It is also important to acknowledge and value “invisible work,” such as mentoring and committee service, and to ensure it is distributed fairly.
Equitable access to education is fundamental, but so is support during key life stages. Parental leave policies that encourage shared caregiving help retain talented researchers of all genders, and practical support during leave can reduce career disruption. In addition, funding-agency practices that account for career interruptions, such as extending eligibility windows, can better support researchers, including women, as they transition into more senior roles.
From your perspective, how does diversity among researchers and clinicians also contribute to more inclusive and patient-centred care?
Healthcare research has historically been more focused on male populations, leading to gaps in understanding conditions that predominantly affect women or present differently across sexes and genders. Increasing diversity among researchers and clinicians broadens the range of questions asked and can improve awareness of sex- and gender-related differences in disease.
A diverse scientific and clinical workforce brings multiple perspectives, leading to better study design, more relevant research questions, and ultimately more equitable healthcare outcomes. Much like biodiversity strengthens ecosystems, diversity strengthens science and medicine.
What piece of advice would you give to young women who are considering or just starting a career in science today?
My advice would be to follow your curiosity and passion with confidence. If science genuinely excites you, trust that interest and pursue it with persistence and dedication. There will be moments of doubt. Seek mentors, support one another, and remember that science benefits enormously from diverse voices.
Your perspective and all perspectives matter.